Write us
By filling out this form, you enable our team to fully understand your needs and offer you the service best suited to your expectations. We thank you for your trust and promise to provide you with a follow up as soon as possible.
Richard LeCouffe
Bar Admission 1976
Law Degree from the Université de Montréal (LL.L. with honours)
Contact information
A Montreal lawyer, Richard practices mainly in real estate law, in particular divided co-ownership law, but also in labour and employment law and administrative law (SST and SAAQ).
He has pleaded before various grievance arbitrators and administrative tribunals in Quebec, in addition to acting as a spokesperson in more than 100 collective agreement negotiations.
He has also written numerous articles on divided co-ownership, in addition to collaborating in the writing of various books, memoirs and conference papers on the subject. In addition, he wrote and taught the labour law course of Module II of the divided co-ownership training offered by ESG-UQAM.
He is appreciated for his enthusiasm, his analytical mind and his professionalism.
-
Services
- Administrative Law
- Collective Agreement Decree
- Contract Termination
- Employment Agreements
- Labour and Employment Law
- Real Estate Law
-
Social Involvement
I find it important to be involved in the dissemination of information to directors, managers and co-owners through the Condolegal.com website.
News
-
Jean Charest chooses TCJ
Therrien Couture Joli-Cœur (TCJ) is proud to announce that Jean Charest is joining its firm.
-
Trademarks
January 1st, 2024 : Increase in official Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) fees - The countdown has begun
To reduce its structural deficit, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) has decided to increase most of its official fees for patents, trademarks, copyrights, industrial designs, geographical indications, official marks, and integrated (…)
-
Labour and Employment
An admitted fault is half forgiven
On January 2nd, 2023, an arbitrator confirmed that soliciting colleagues to participate in a pyramid scheme and lying to his employer on the matter constitutes sufficient grounds to justify the dismissal of an employee.
Contact Richard LeCouffe